1. OTIF Early-Warning Engine
Models fabric-in, cutting, sewing and finishing telemetry against the buyer's ship date to flag PO risk two weeks out — with the specific line, operation and bottleneck named. Target: OTIF up 8-12 points and air-freight recovery cost cut sharply.
Business impact
OTIF
Build effort
Internal platform
Projected lift
OTIF
Time to value
From kickoff
Interactions / month
Agent-handled
Automation rate
No human in loop
Net value / year
Revenue + cost avoided − run cost
Payback
Cumulative net positive
Adoption curve
Agent-handled volume vs pre-agent baseline
Baseline (manual process)
Readiness scorecard
Six delivery dimensions
Outcome funnel
How otif is produced
- Eligible interactions4,227
- Agent-handled3,52783%
- Qualified outcome1,47742%
- OTIF won74751%
Usage by geography
Cost mix
Share of run cost
- Inference43%
- Integration33%
- Data prep25%
- Change mgmt14%
Cohort retention
Share of users still using the product weekly
| W1 | W2 | W3 | W4 | W6 | W8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1 | 101 | 94 | 82 | 73 | 71 | 61 |
| Cohort 2 | 105 | 96 | 85 | 74 | 67 | 52 |
| Cohort 3 | 106 | 97 | 85 | 68 | 56 | 46 |
| Cohort 4 | 101 | 96 | 83 | 75 | 70 | 56 |
| Cohort 5 | 102 | 97 | 86 | 70 | 62 | 57 |
Performance by geography
Indexed 0–100 across five signals
| Volume | Accuracy | Deflection | CSAT | Revenue | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethiopia | 73 | 81 | 94 | 54 | 67 |
| India | 76 | 84 | 68 | 86 | 87 |
| USA buyers | 87 | 51 | 44 | 52 | 89 |
| EU buyers | 98 | 37 | 88 | 83 | 51 |
Model quality
Live vs target
| Metric | Current | Target | 30-day | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision | 85 | 90 | +3.1 | Closing gap |
| Recall | 82 | 85 | +4.4 | Closing gap |
| Grounded-answer rate | 89 | 95 | +1.8 | Closing gap |
| Escalation rate | 12 | 6 | -2.2 | On target |
| P95 latency (s) | 4 | 3 | -0.4 | On target |
| Hallucination flags / 1k | 3 | 1 | -0.9 | On target |
Service levels
93%
Impact score
45%
Delivery ease
89%
Uptime (30 days)
Unit economics
₹ per year, indexed to pilot scale
- Revenue influenced₹3.1Cr
- Cost avoided₹63L
- Run cost₹47L
- Net value₹2.9Cr
Cumulative ROI by quarter
Channel mix
- Voice12%
- WhatsApp19%
- Web40%
- Field app17%
- Email12%
Language mix
- English11%
- Hindi9%
- Amharic23%
Segment performance
Volume, automation and win rate per market
| Market | Interactions | Automation | OTIF | Value | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethiopia | 427 | 68% | 40% | ₹43L | t0t1t2t3t4t5t6t7 |
| India | 413 | 61% | 29% | ₹31L | t0t1t2t3t4t5t6t7 |
| USA buyers | 406 | 78% | 37% | ₹65L | t0t1t2t3t4t5t6t7 |
| EU buyers | 403 | 66% | 27% | ₹82L | t0t1t2t3t4t5t6t7 |
Experiment log
What we tested on this product
| Experiment | Status | Result | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prompt v3 vs v2 | Won | +6% otif | Aiera Labs |
| Voice-first vs chat-first | Running | +3% so far | Growth Pod |
| Retrieval window 8k → 32k | Won | -4% escalations | Platform |
| Human review threshold 0.7 | Rolled back | no lift | Ops |
| Vernacular tone pack | Running | +8 CSAT pts | CX |
Risk register
Owned mitigations before scale
| Risk | Severity | Mitigation | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data freshness in source systems | Medium | Hourly sync + staleness alerts | Data Eng |
| Regulatory language in outputs | High | Buyer code of conduct | Compliance |
| Field-team adoption | Medium | In-app nudges + weekly coaching drills | Sales Ops |
| Model cost drift | Low | Router to smaller models for routine intents | Platform |
Where it sits in the portfolio
Tap another dot to switch product
Systems it touches
- Live
MES / line monitoring
Hourly output, efficiency and WIP by line
- Live
SAP + PLM
PO, BOM, fabric-in dates and shipment plan
- In build
Buyer portals (Tech-pack/Traceability)
Committed dates and revision alerts
Product brief
Who uses it
Plant heads, merchandising, buyers
Metric it moves
OTIF
Why Arvind wins
Risk surfaced while it can still be fixed, not at the shipping week
Guardrails
Applied to every response
- Buyer code of conduct
- Audit trail
- Labour compliance statements
Delivery plan
14-week path to production
Weeks 1–3
Ground the data
Connect 3 product sets, historical conversations and CRM outcomes.
Weeks 4–6
Pilot with one team
Run in Ethiopia with human review on every output.
Weeks 7–10
Automate the loop
Hand otif decisions to the agent with escalation thresholds.
Weeks 11–14
Scale across lines
Roll out to 3 languages and all geographies.
How it works
End-to-end, from signal to learned outcome
01
Capture the signal
Every Voice and WhatsApp interaction, plus CRM and order events, is streamed in and tagged to a customer, Bottoms and geography.
02
Ground the context
Production telemetry indexes the 3 Arvind product sets, pricing rules and policy language so nothing is answered from memory alone.
03
Reason and decide
Delay risk model scores the situation and picks the next best action — answer, quote, schedule, escalate — with a confidence threshold behind it.
04
Act in the workflow
Bottleneck attribution writes back into CRM/ERP and fires the customer-facing action in English or Hindi, so the team sees it where they already work.
05
Learn from outcome
Won/lost and otif outcomes flow back nightly; prompts, thresholds and routing are retuned every fortnight.
Data it runs on
Sources, contents and refresh cadence
- Streaming
Conversation history
Voice, WhatsApp, Buyer portal, Vendor calls transcripts with intent, objection and sentiment labels.
- Hourly
Catalogue & pricing
Bottoms · Tops · Programs with specs, availability and approved commercial language.
- 15 min
CRM outcomes
Stage moves, win/loss reasons and owner activity per enquiry.
- Hourly
Operations systems
ERP order, stock, dispatch and service records used to answer status questions.
- Daily
Market signals
Demand and competitor movement across 4 geographies via DeployOneSense.
Customer & team journey
1Trigger
Plant heads, merchandising, buyers hits the moment this product exists for — otif up 8-12 points and air-freight recovery cost cut sharply
2Agent acts
Aiera responds within seconds on Voice, grounded in the live catalogue and the customer's own history.
3Human in the loop
Anything below the confidence threshold, or touching Buyer code of conduct, routes to a named owner with full context attached.
4Close the loop
Outcome is written back, the customer gets a summary on WhatsApp, and otif is attributed to this product.
Metric tree
What we steer and what we protect
North star
OTIF
Drivers
- Agent-handled share of eligible interactions
- First-response time and resolution time
- Qualified outcomes per 100 conversations in Ethiopia
- Repeat engagement within 30 days
Guardrail metrics
- Grounded-answer rate above 95%
- Escalation rate inside agreed band
- Buyer code of conduct
- Run cost per conversation below target
Squad to build it
Who is needed and for what
- 0.5 FTE
Product owner (Arvind)
Scope, adoption and the business case
- 1 FTE
Conversation designer
Prompts, tone and 3-language scripts
- 1 FTE
Data / integration engineer
CRM, ERP and telephony wiring
- 0.5 FTE
ML engineer
Scoring models, evaluation harness, drift
- 0.2 FTE each
Ops champion per market
Floor adoption across 4 geographies
Commercials
How the product pays for itself
- Delivery model
- Internal platform
- Cost drivers
- Inference volume, telephony minutes, integration upkeep
- Charge basis
- Per market licence + usage
- Break-even
- 9 months at pilot volume
- Scale unit
- One geography × one Bottoms
Rollout waves
Scope and the exit test for each wave
Wave 1 — Prove
Ethiopia, Bottoms, human review on every output.
Exit test: OTIF beats manual baseline on 200+ conversations.
Wave 2 — Automate
Add India and Hindi; agent acts without review above threshold.
Exit test: Escalation rate under 10% for four straight weeks.
Wave 3 — Extend
All 3 product sets and 4 channels, wired into CRM reporting.
Exit test: Adoption above 70% of eligible interactions.
Wave 4 — Compound
Roll across 4 geographies and share the model with sibling Arvind businesses.
Exit test: Net value positive at run-rate; owned by business-as-usual team.
Dependencies to unblock
Needed before wave 1 starts
- API access to CRM and ERP for Arvind Garmenting
- Approved language pack for English, Hindi, Amharic
- Telephony numbers and consent records for outbound
- Sign-off on Buyer code of conduct
- Named market champions for floor adoption
Open questions for the business
Answer these to lock the scope
- Which Ethiopia team runs the pilot and who signs off on outcomes?
- How far back does usable conversation history go for Bottoms?
- What confidence threshold is acceptable before the agent acts unattended?
- Which existing report does otif get compared against?